<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SaltCycle - Latest Comments in 2.75 Pound Bike Frame Technology from BYU Laboratory</title><link>http://saltcycle.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://saltcycle.disqus.com/275_pound_bike_frame_technology_from_byu_laboratory/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:16:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 2.75 Pound Bike Frame Technology from BYU Laboratory</title><link>http://www.saltcycle.com/2007/12/06/275-pound-bike-frame-technology-from-byu-laboratory/#comment-8821904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clearly these people have never had the pleasure of riding a 35 pound Dutch bike.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2.75 Pound Bike Frame Technology from BYU Laboratory</title><link>http://www.saltcycle.com/2007/12/06/275-pound-bike-frame-technology-from-byu-laboratory/#comment-8821903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good link to the article on fatcyclist.  i really enjoyed it.  i really am out of the loop when it comes to all the latest weight of bicycles and associated components.  mostly ride, for ridings sake on a bicycle. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i actually like the web-like design for some reason.... something different in the realm of bland same frames, though i am more of the neopunk bicyclist myself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zed</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 02:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2.75 Pound Bike Frame Technology from BYU Laboratory</title><link>http://www.saltcycle.com/2007/12/06/275-pound-bike-frame-technology-from-byu-laboratory/#comment-8821902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also there are a lot of other carbon frames that weigh about that much, so it's really no big deal. Did you read this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fatcyclist.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.fatcyclist.com/"&gt;http://www.fatcyclist.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mikey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2.75 Pound Bike Frame Technology from BYU Laboratory</title><link>http://www.saltcycle.com/2007/12/06/275-pound-bike-frame-technology-from-byu-laboratory/#comment-8821901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2.75 lbs until you ride through some mud, then it's an $7k 5 lb frame!  Neat tech and all, but ugly and stupid expensive.  I'm sure we'll see  tons of them rolling the park city trails in the spring.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>